View the book

(~72 pg)Read Online
(5.8 M)PDF
(5.1 M)B/W PDF
(~72 pg)EPUB
(~72 pg)Kindle
(~72 pg)Daisy
(201.2 K)Full Text
(3.1 M)DjVu

All Files: HTTP

Resources

Bookmark

Watson's magazine [serial] (1906)

Author: Watson, Thomas E. (Thomas Edward), 1856-1922, ed
Volume: 21,5 (1915)
Publisher: Thomson, Ga. : Jeffersonian Pub. Co.
Possible copyright status: NOT_IN_COPYRIGHT
Language: English
Call number: b5297193
Digitizing sponsor: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Book contributor: Watson-Brown Foundation, Thomson, Georgia
Collection: unclibraries; americana

Full catalog record: MARCXML

Description

Description based on: v. 18, no. 1 (Nov. 1913); title from cover

Editor: - , T. E. Watson

Write a review
Downloaded 221 times Reviews
Average Rating:

Reviewer: anderson10 - - April 19, 2011
Subject: Watson was a KKK supporter and a bigot - read his writings
And here's another pretense that Tom Watson was a fair analyst of facts. He was not. He was a KKK-supporting, anti-semitic, anti-Chatholic bigot. Look up his writings on any of these subjects. What in the world is up with the guy that;'s posting this Tom Watson drivel all over this site? Watson's anti-semitic writings incited the lynching of Leo Frank, and afterwards, his writings celebrated that lynching. What in the world in motivating these postings about a 100 old murder? Well, some of the other postings have reviews that are almost as anti-semitic as some of Watson's own writings.

Reviewer: manhattansunrise - - October 18, 2010
Subject: Watson Solve the Murder of Mary Phagan and Leo M. Frank Case
Watson Solve the Murder of Mary Phagan and Leo M. Frank Case

When Frank told the jury he must have been
at the 2nd floor toilet during the
five minutes that Monteen waited in his office, the jury must have felt the cold chills
run up their spines, for the jury knew
that Mary had not "unconsciously"
gone to the toilet, at the same time
Frank did!

What Leo M. Frank, the doomed man, and his
bewildered lawyers failed to see was
this:

It was just as necessary for him to
explain WHERE MARY WAS, while
Monteen waited, as to explain HIS
OWN DISAPPEARANCE, at that
fatal time between 12:05 and 12:10.

Frank's repeated statements en-
trapped himself beyond escape. He said,
again and again, that Mary came next
to Hattie Hall (who left at 12:02), and
he did not mention Monteen Stover (who was
in Frank's office from 12:05 to 12:10)
coming at all. This proved to the jury
that he did not know of Monteen's coming.

And he would have known it, had he been in his
2nd floor office, when he said he was. Now,
as he had (in ignorance of Monteen's
visit) placed both Mary and himself
in his office — while Monteen waited —
he had deliberately and repeatedly
lied as to Mary's whereabouts, as well
as his own. He might have "unconsciously"
gone to the toilet. Very well; but where
did Mary Phagan go people are asking?

Because Phagan's hair, and her blood, and the
only possible explanation of the wounds— the swollen eye in front, and the scalp cut on the back of the head, ranging from down upward — were
all back there at the metal department, where the toilet was.

Infatuated young degenerate! To
escape Monteen's evidence, and to
explain his absence from his office, he
supposed himself to have gone, "un-
consciously," to the only place in his
house where there were damning evi-
dences of the crime in the 2nd floor metal room.

Selected metadata

Page-progression:	lr
Scanningcenter:	chapelhill
Mediatype:	texts
Identifier:	watsonsmagazines215wats
Ppi:	400
Camera:	Canon 5D
Operator:	alicia@...
Scanner:	scribe1.chapelhill.archive.org
Scandate:	20090505140146
Imagecount:	72
Identifier-access:	http://www.archive.org/details/watsonsmagazines215wats
Identifier-ark:	ark:/13960/t2d79q72p
Ocr:	ABBYY FineReader 8.0
Sponsordate:	20090930